close fullscreen

Publications+When should two minds be considered versions of one another?

help edit space_dashboard
Draft — This content has not been approved for publication.
ai generated
more_horiz
open_in_full page
fullscreen modal
edit edit
space_dashboard advanced
Authors: Ben Goertzel

← Back to Publications

When Should Two Minds Be Considered Versions of One Another?

Authors:

Ben Goertzel

Year: 2012
Venue: International Journal of Machine Consciousness (2012)
Links: paper (PDF)

Summary

Asks when two minds can sensibly be considered versions or natural continuations of one another — a question arising in mind uploading (whether an approximate upload is a genuine continuation) and in the rapid post-upload mental growth that may follow (when growth is so discontinuous that continuity of self is lost). Using category theory and probability, it argues that “approximately smooth” growth preserves continuity of self and a mind's rough comprehension of its own change process, favoring growth constrained to remain quasi-comprehensible to the minds undergoing it.

Relevance to Hyperon

An identity-continuity and safety source directly relevant to the Self-Modification and Safety Deep Dive — its notion of bounded, “quasi-comprehensible” self-change is a conceptual predecessor of the card's bounded behavioral-divergence criterion (div(old,new) ≤ ε) and goal-stability machinery for safe self-modification.

Key References

  • RawData source
  • Self-Modification and Safety Deep Dive


Tags

help edit space_dashboard
ai generated
more_horiz
open_in_full page
fullscreen modal
edit edit
space_dashboard advanced


Discussion